Child Indicators Research, 2, 57–77.įelver, J. When children are asked about their well-being: Towards a framework for guiding policy. Social Indicators Research, 80, 5–29.įattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377–389.įattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 225–241. Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11, 193–221.ĭurlak, J. The study of implementation: Current findings from effective programs that prevent mental disorders in school-aged children. Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 335–341.ĭiamond, A., & Lee, K. Activities and programs that improve children’s executive functions. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1–8.ĭiamond, A. The interplay of biology and the environment broadly defined. Mindfulness-based interventions: An emerging phenomenon. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 27–36.Ĭullen, M. A children’s social desirability questionnaire. Meditation increases compassionate responses to suffering. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 449–464.Ĭondon, P., Desbordes, G., Miller, W., DeSteno, D., Hospital, M. Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 263–278.Ĭhiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. A randomized controlled pilot trial of classroom-based mindfulness meditation compared to an active control condition in sixth-grade children. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.īritton, W. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 855–866.īraun, V., & Clarke, V. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for the treatment of adolescent psychiatric outpatients: A randomized clinical trial. Child Indicators Research, 3–16.īiegel, G. The child indicators movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 74, 573–596.īen-Arieh, A. Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.īen-Arieh, A. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. Finally, we discuss potential directions for future research on mindfulness-based SEL programs. Furthermore, we report findings from research examining students’ and teachers’ descriptions of their experiences with MindUP as a way in which to further understand the program’s effectiveness from the perspectives of the consumers. To illustrate our perspective on implementation science and mindfulness programs in education, we provide an overview of several studies conducted on MindUP. We emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary research in evaluating mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for students and teachers alike, research that utilizes mixed-method designs and that examines multiple outcomes from multiple observers (e.g., self-reports, teacher reports, peer reports). We suggest that the transitional years of pre- and early adolescence (i.e., 9–12 year olds) may be a particularly effective time to introduce mindfulness practices to young people. We discuss how mindfulness practices and SEL activities may be synergistic, potentially bolstering the efficacy of each, and describe the iterative process of developing, implementing, and evaluating a program that includes both elements. In this chapter, we describe the MindUP program: A universal, mindfulness-based social and emotional learning (SEL) program designed to be implemented in schools by regular classroom teachers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |